Date: 20.4.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 740 #Research papers on electronic voting

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Research papers on electronic voting

Research papers on electronic voting

Mar/Fri/2018 | Uncategorized

The Technical Feasibility and Security of E-Voting

Research papers on electronic voting

Pay for Exclusive Essay -
New applied e-voting system - Journal of Theoretical and Applied

argument article When the topic of abortion is discussed, people tend to assume one of two standpoints: “pro-life” (they believe that women should not have the ability to abort a human life because it would constitute murder) or “pro-choice” (they believe that the woman carrying the fetus should be given the research papers on electronic right to decide whether to carry the baby to term or abort it). Although Americans are divided on the subject of abortion by these beliefs, most do not fall strictly on one side or the other and ultimately the references essay majority favors restricted availability. Research Papers Voting! There are variations within each group depending on existence philosophy essay how liberal or conservative one’s opinions are; some individuals who are pro-life believe that in cases of research papers on electronic voting rape or incest abortion should be allowed, and some pro-choice groups favor waiting periods and other restrictions on abortion. Furthermore, pro-choice proponents do not necessarily support or advocate abortion?they simply want women to have control over their own bodies and futures. Therefore, contrary to popular media portrayals of the debate between pro-life and problems in materialism and culture essays pro-choice groups, there is research on electronic not actually a clear-cut line between the two sides of the argument for many American citizens. No matter which side you have personally taken (if you so choose to “pick” a side), it is important to understand what the opposing position believes. Existence! The more you know about the papers on electronic voting arguments in favor of or against philosophy essay abortion, the better prepared you will be if you must make this type of decision regarding your own pregnancy. Papers On Electronic Voting! The fetus is a human being from the moment of conception; this means abortion is murder, which is immoral and should be illegal.

If the vs organic farming essay pregnancy is the on electronic result of carelessness on the mother’s part (i.e., she did not take the proper precautionary measures to references essay, effectively prevent an unintended pregnancy), she should have to deal with the research papers on electronic voting consequences. It is ultimately her responsibility (as the partner who can become pregnant) to existence of god philosophy essay, prevent pregnancy if both she and her male partner do not wish to conceive. If abortions are unconditionally accepted by society and easily obtainable, people will use them as a regular form of birth control. Research Papers! All babies have great potential; a woman could possibly abort a fetus that could have grown up to be of great importance to society or the world at large. Many religions do not endorse abortion or certain forms of birth control. This is because such religions may believe that sexual intercourse is for procreation purposes only or because any children conceived within a marriage are children of thesis God. Terminating a child of God is a moral sin.

Every child born should come into the world wanted, loved, and cared for. Planned children often have better life prospects because caregivers are better prepared to support the child physically, emotionally, and financially. The fetus is not yet a human being because it cannot survive outside the uterus on its own. Abortion should not be considered murder if the fetus is not self-sustaining and requires the mother’s body and physical resources to survive. The body of first priority is therefore the mother’s, and it should be her choice as to what she endures both mentally and physically. A woman’s body belongs to herself, and she should be free to do what she deems necessary for her body and overall health in any situation. In cases of rape or incest, the resulting baby could be a constant reminder to the woman of the trauma she experienced.

Research also suggests that the babies of such cases face a higher risk of neglect or abuse from their mothers for various reasons. Many foster homes and papers on electronic voting orphanages are beyond capacity; putting a child into the foster care system would weigh even heavier on already-scarce resources. Conventional Vs Organic Farming Essay! Abortion is overall a very safe procedure. Less than 1% of abortions performed before 21 weeks of pregnancy result in major complications such as heavy bleeding or infection. On Electronic Voting! If abortion is made illegal, surely many women will continue to seek them in secrecy and likely sacrafice sanitary conditions and conventional farming essay professional care; illegitimate abortions have caused thousands of women to die throughout history all over the world. Non-Polarized Views in the United States: Some Statistics. Depending on the questions you ask, you may get different responses from those surveyed on research on electronic the subject of abortion.

However, a consistent finding is that only small percentages of Americans hold extreme opinions on whether abortion should “never” be legal or “always” be legal. Vs Organic Essay! Most Americans fall somewhere in research voting between these extremities of restated in conclusion opinions. When asked “Under what circumstances should abortion be legal?” the following responses yielded data representative of the gray area between the two “opposing sides” of pro-life and pro-choice supporters [emphases added]. On Electronic Voting! - “Under no circumstances” should abortion be a legal practice: 20% of respondents agreed. Statements For Arumentative Research! - “Under any circumstances” abortion should be a legal practice: 24% of respondents agreed. - “Under a few circumstances” abortion should be a legal practice: 40% of respondents agreed. - “Under most circumstances” abortion should be a legal practice: 15% of respondents agreed. Papers On Electronic Voting! Furthermore, the data show those who believe abortion should never be legal are the minority among those who support abortion in all cases or those who support it under certain circumstances. The Debate is Centralized around Specific Issues: The Gray Area. People often consider the following when deciding whether they hold an extreme position for in conclusion or against the legality of abortion.

Depending on which issues they deem more important as an individual, their position may lean closer to one side or the other, but many Americans usually maintain a neutral position and on electronic voting evaluate abortion on essay a case-by-case basis. Should abortion be restricted by papers on electronic voting imposing conditions on it such as mandatory 24-hour waiting periods or mandatory counseling about alternatives to abortion? Currently, 21 American states require parental consent for abortion if the woman is under 18 years of age, and 38 states require “parental involvement” in problems in materialism and culture the decision if the woman is a minor.2 This means that a parent or guardian (or both parents/guardians) may need to give consent, receive notification, or provide notarized documentation of consent for an abortion to be performed. Should abortions be banned after a certain duration of pregnancy? There is no current American legislation banning abortion after a fixed point in pregnancy. However, the later in pregnancy an abortion is performed the more risky it becomes. Many practicing clinicians reserve the right to refuse an abortion completely or to decide they will not perform an research abortion after a specific amount of time out of concern regarding the thesis for arumentative paper safety of the procedure for research on electronic the patient. Because dilation and extraction abortions closely resemble the references birthing process or miscarriage, people are often weary of this type of abortion.

The fetus is removed from the uterus intact and papers on electronic voting is further along in development. Americans are more accepting of abortions that occur early in pregnancy when the fetus is not as developed and is not “viable” (able to survive on its own outside of the statements woman’s body). In terms of research which trimester Americans are the most accepting of abortions taking place, about 41% agree first-trimester abortions should be permitted. Additionally, about 15% of Americans agree that both first- and second-trimester abortions should be permitted, about 29% say abortion should never be permitted, and 5% are unsure. Should financially-challenged women’s abortions be publicly funded? Currently, all American states are required to thesis statements, fund abortions in certain circumstances (namely for women who have been raped, who are victims of inscest, or whose lives are in danger as a result of the research pregnancy). Some states and organizations voluntarily fund abortions under other varying circumstances. The bottom line is restated that abortion is a safe and legal way to end a pregnancy in the United States. Research Papers! A woman is entitled to choose whether to carry her pregnancy to term or to terminate her pregnancy as she sees fit.

If you and/or your partner are deciding whether to references, terminate your own pregnancy or carry it to term, there is no such thing as not making a decision. Once a pregnancy has been established, you must decide to either carry it to term or terminate the fetal development. Knowing where you and your partner stand on the possibility of abortion will better equip you to make a decision that is mutually beneficial, and research being knowledgeable about abortion (and the restated in conclusion arguments on both sides) contributes to making an informed decision. Please explore the other related topics on our site that can give you additional insight into your feelings on abortion and the alternative options available regarding pregnancy. Last Updated 10 June 2014. 1. Papers Voting! LeVay, Simon, Janice Baldwin, and John Baldwin.

Discovering Human Sexualiy. References Essay! Sinauer Associates, Inc., 2009. is maintained by papers students from the University of California, Santa Barbara who have studied advanced topics in human sexuality. UCSB SexInfo Copyright 2017 University of California, Santa Barbara. Research! All Rights Reserved.

Write My Research Paper -
Secure Electronic Voting - Terena

Part 8 - Examples of research Good and Bad Writing. Learning to write often works best by example. The following are excerpts from nine first-year student essays. Most of the examples are bad, although I did find a two good examples in the bunch. Thesis For Arumentative Research? In most cases, the names and dates from the essays have been changed to papers on electronic, not compromise the subject matter for future students (in other words, don't use any of the apparent research information here in your papers). I have tried to categorize the statements, errors as best as I could. Errors or bad portions are usually bolded to help you identify them. Smith was a religious, Christian man. His notion of monads included contextual references to God. Research On Electronic Voting? He believed that God controls the harmony of life through these monads. The essay then goes on to discuss these monads in a Christian context.

Had the student omitted the above sentences, however, the discussion of making religion would have been completely out of place, given the essay's topic. But since the person being discussed had religious views that affected his theories and work, it is relevant to mention the religious aspect. Had Smith's religion not been a direct influence on his work, it would have been irrelevant. Similarly, you wouldn't mention other things about someone in an essay if it wasn't relevant to the topic. For example, it is research voting, irrelevant to mention a scientist's race in an essay about their discovery unless the race impacted the conventional vs organic farming essay, discovery. An example of this might be if a black scientist's prime motivation to find a cure for sickle cell anemia was because that disease strikes black people in on electronic, proportionally higher numbers. If the same scientist was researching some aspect of physics, it would probably not be relevant to mention the race at and culture selected, all. An introductory paragraph: On March 4, 1849, John Smith was born to Anna Bradcock Smith and James Smith. Although certainly not of humble origins, John was acquainted with several prominent and papers on electronic voting influential men of politics with whom he discussed matters of mathematics, history, science, logic, law, and theology.

Smith was brilliant in problems selected essays, each of these fields, but he became known particularly for his contributions in the fields of philosophy, mathematics, and logistics. This paper will not only shed light on some of on electronic voting Smith's theories and words regarding these three areas, but will also tell of the events in his life that made him the problems selected essays, man that he was. This is the introduction to a chronologically-ordered essay about papers, Smith's life and discoveries. Thesis? As such, the choice to papers on electronic, begin with his date of birth is a good one. The paragraph summarizes the of god essay, fields touched by Smith and also mentions the key areas he studied. The paper sets up an expectation for research on electronic voting, the reader of both a detailed explanation of Smith's discoveries and anecdotes describing his personality. The sentence structure is grammatically sound and flows well. In the restated thesis in conclusion, late 1650's , Smith's mother returned to London , she then pulled him out of school with the intent to make him a farmer . Apostrophes indicate possessiveness or contractions, not plurality.

The decade is the 1650s. The sentence is a run-on. Papers Voting? It should either end after London, beginning a new sentence with She then, or the she then should be changed to and. To make someone a farmer is to create a farmer for restated thesis in conclusion, them. The student meant: to turn him into a farmer or to encourage him to be a farmer. Smith invented the widgetiscope and paved the way for on electronic, future widget watching. All-the-while remaining a simple and humble man who considered himself to conventional vs organic farming essay, be part of a team working for the greater good. The bolded part is not a complete sentence. The entire thing should be one sentence.

All-the-while does not require hyphenation. The two differing approaches of development already described, eventually led to the development of the two original branches of research papers on electronic widgetry; fingleish and fnordleish. This sentence is mispunctuated. The comma is confusing and should be removed, and the semicolon should be a colon. Another of Smith's ideas was the method of essay differentiation.

The university re-opened after the plague in 1667. Research Papers? Smith was elected to a minor fellowship, and awarded a major fellowship after he received his Master's Degree (Bogus 4). After the realization that Calculus was important, and was being recognized, a document to record all of the theories became a necessity. The Methodis Differantium, the document that contained the elements of the theory of differentiation, was created in 1667. Statements Research? Smith believed he was being pulled in two directions when it came to publishing his theories and making his work known. He felt a need for fame and papers on electronic fortune, yet on thesis for arumentative the other hand he had an abundant fear of rejection. To the dismay of many future mathematicians, it was never published because of Smith's fear of criticism.

Since he was not focusing on on electronic publishing his work, Smith pursued his career as a professor. This so-called paragraph is an utter mess. There are far too many ideas in thesis statements, it, all of which are strung together haphazardly without any logical flow. I'll try to dissect and rewrite it, but I won't make errors bold because the entire paragraph would be bold if I did. First, let's pick out the different topics being addressed: the method of differentiation the papers, university re-opening after the plague Smith's ascension through the vs organic farming, university ranks the research papers voting, need of a document detailing differentiation, which was eventually created Smith's mental state, desires and fears. Now, if we replace each sentence with the number of the corresponding idea, we can see what a jumbled mess this is: 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3. Don't introduce a paragraph with one topic and then leap to restated thesis, another topic in the next sentence. While it may sometimes be necessary to mention something as an papers on electronic voting aside to complement the topic, the return to the topic should be swift and easy to understand.

Don't bounce around within the paragraph as this student has done. Another problem: there doesn't seem to be a coherent timeline within the paragraph. Thesis In Conclusion? Did the university re-open in 1667, or was the papers on electronic voting, plague in 1667? Is the student saying that Smith was elected to a minor fellowship that year or another year? Similarly, when did the major fellowship and for arumentative research Master's Degree come in? It's unlikely to have all happened in one year, though it is possible. The document was created in 1667, it seems, but when did Smith decide not to publish and seek work as a professor instead? Also 1667? It sounds like that was a very busy year for poor Smith!

The sentences themselves are also awkwardly constructed, making the entire thing hard to understand. I'll make some assumptions regarding the confusing date information. Here is how this information should have been presented: Smith's ideas on the method of differentiation were gaining recognition in the mathematical community, which made it necessary for him to produce a document detailing all of his theories on the subject. Research On Electronic? Thus, when the university re-opened in references essay, 1667 following the plague and Smith was elected to a minor fellowship, he wrote Methodis Differantium. Although Smith wished to research voting, attain fame and fortune, he also feared rejection. Conventional Vs Organic Farming? This dichotomy resulted in his failure to publish Methodis Differantium; a failure that would be mourned by mathematicians well into the future. Still, Smith was awarded a major fellowship after receiving his Master's Degree in [insert year]. Since he was not interested in publishing his work, he concentrated instead on pursuing a position as a professor. Queen Esmerelda knighted Jones in 1705 to be given the title of Sir Joe Smith, which made him the first scientist to be so honored for his work (Bogus) . The phrase to on electronic voting, be given is awkward here. It would be better written: Queen Esmerelda knighted Jones in 1705, which gave him the title of Sir.

Who else could be honoured for Smith's work other than Smith? It should say: . which made him the first man to be honored for problems and culture selected essays, scientific work. There probably should be a page number listed in research voting, the citation. Jones had a main idea of analytic geometry. What does this mean? Does the student mean that one of Jones' main ideas concerned analytic geometry? Does he mean that one of the main ideas of analytic geometry was conceived by Jones? Or does he mean something else entirely? This makes little sense and is very awkward. Whether Smith made no use of the manuscript from which he had copied abstracts , or whether he had previously invented the widgetiscope, are questions on which at this distance of time no direct evidence is available . If Smith made no use of the manuscript, he can't have used it to copy abstracts. This is a very awkward way of saying that the events in for arumentative research paper, question happened so long ago that there is no longer sufficient evidence to research voting, answer certain questions.

It would be better written: Questions as to whether Smith made further use of the manuscript from which he copied abstracts or whether he had previously invented the widgetiscope are rooted so far in the past that it is problems selected, impossible to gather sufficient direct evidence to provide answers. This is research, still a bit awkward. It's best when broken up into smaller sentences: There are still questions as to whether Smith made further use of the restated thesis in conclusion, manuscript from which he copied abstracts or whether he had previously invented the widgetiscope. Such questions are rooted so far in the past, however, that it is impossible to gather sufficient direct evidence to provide answers. Smith formed a political plan to try to persuade the research, Germans to attack the French due to him not agreeing with their political agendas and this proved the means of his visiting Hamburg. Due to him not agreeing with is a very awkward way of saying: because he disagreed with. The second bolded part should be a separate sentence. Conventional Vs Organic? Proved the means of his visiting is a very awkward way of on electronic voting saying is why he visited. Jones explained ideas too enormous to understand, and simplified problems too complex to approach.

Not only is this hyperbole, it's also logically impossible. If the ideas were too complicated to understand, Jones couldn't have understood them himself. In Conclusion? If the research voting, problems were too complex to approach, Jones could not have approached them. Mismatched Words, Phrases, and Pronouns. After marrying Elizabeth, Smith's father fell ill for thesis for arumentative research paper, several months. After no sign of on electronic recovery, a lawyer was summoned to of god essay, the manor. A will was drawn up, including one hundred acres of land, the manor house, livestock, grain, and Smith Senior's death (Bogus 10). His mother gave birth to Smith three months after Smith senior died.

He was premature after suffering from illness due to the shock of papers on electronic voting her husband's passing during the fall . The phrase after no sign of recovery is not properly attached to statements for arumentative research, Smith's father. Instead, it is saying that the lawyer did not recover from something. A will does not include land, a house, etc. On Electronic? It states to whom such things are bequeathed. Problems Selected Essays? This should say: A will was drawn up leaving one hundred acres of land, the manor house, livestock and research voting grain to conventional farming essay, [whomever]. I don't even understand how and Smith Senior's death fits into this sentence. His in papers on electronic, the sentence His mother gave birth. refers to the antecedent Smith Senior. Existence Of God Philosophy? Thus, Smith Senior's mother gave birth to Smith Senior's son. That would necessitate incest, and is clearly not what the student meant to say. They should have simply said Elizabeth gave birth.

Who else but someone's mother gives birth to them anyway? Given the confusions regarding the various Smiths, it would have been better if the student had used first names during this part of the on electronic voting, essay. Statements Paper? There is inconsistency in research voting, capitalization. Conventional Vs Organic? It is Smith Senior once, and Smith senior another time. The he in he was premature again refers to papers on electronic voting, the wrong antecedent.

Smith Senior was not premature. Smith did not suffer illness due to the shock of Smith Senior's passing. Elizabeth did. This sentence says that Smith suffered the illness. The student suddenly introduces the phrase during the fall when no other mention of the season has been made. This could be confused with Smith Senior dying from a fall. Lastly, the inverse relationship between area and philosophy the tangent were never attained. The relationship is singular, even though it refers to multiple elements. Thus, the papers on electronic voting, verb were should be singular as well, and changed to was. It was this century where many of the worlds most honorable and highly respected mathematicians created what we know today as calculus. A century is not a place, it is statements for arumentative, a section of time.

Say it is a place where. or a time when. In this case, It was this century when. Adding an 's' without an apostrophe in this case is pluralization, not indicative of possession. The student means world's. But perhaps the largest obstacle , which the Greeks could not overcome, were their insufficient number and measuring system . Were is plural, but obstacle and system are singular. It should be was. Tragically at the age of six, Smith's father died. This says that Smith's father died at research, the age of six. The student means: Tragically, when Smith was six years old his father died. Jones, now familiar with Smith's discoveries, wrote Smith a letter soon after the existence philosophy, publication of his discoveries.

After the research on electronic voting, publication of whose discoveries: Jones' or Smith's? Jones reasoned that if he could calculate the in conclusion, angles of the projected colour, a new law of refraction could be made . People can make legal laws, but natural or scientific laws are discovered. To make a new law of refraction, Jones would have to alter physics. During the seventeenth century, the inhabitants of England did not realize the importance of scientific advancement. Inhabitants could well mean non-human creatures, and papers voting is thus a poor choice of a word.

Are we to understand that ALL of the people in England failed to realize the importance of scientific advancement for an entire century? It would have been better if the student had said most people in making statements, England. At the current time, the dominant belief was that light traveled in wave . The current time is the moment the reader is reading the sentence. The student meant to say that the belief was such during the historical time period being discussed. Current should be omitted. The phrase in wave has an error. Research Voting? It should either be in waves or in a wave. Both may be correct, but such an error can be misunderstood if one is incorrect. This would likely have been caught if the student had read the paper out loud. Secondly, Jones' reliance on geometric algebra rather than symbolic notation created considerable impedance to the identification of problems selected solutions of research on electronic voting computational features found frequently to existence of god, different problems. Here is an example of a student not knowing the proper meaning of a word.

Impedance means opposition to the flow of voting electric current. It does not mean the thesis, same as to impede, which is to be an obstacle. Research? This could be an instance where a student used the thesaurus in statements, a word processor to come up with a word without bothering to check if the word fit the research on electronic voting, context. It could also simply be that the student had mislearned the statements for arumentative, word themselves. Incidentally, a quick check of MS Word 97 shows synonyms to impedance to be obstruction, block, baffle, hindrance, breakwater, fin, and research on electronic voting maze.

So here is direct proof that you shouldn't always trust what a word processor thesaurus tells you is an essay equivalent word. Be diligent and look up unfamiliar words in the dictionary before using them in your essay. In studying widgetry, it serves as great importance that one is aware of the research papers on electronic voting, two systems of widgetry; fingleish and fnordleish. Something does not serve as great importance, and one being aware doesn't fit either. This is references essay, a student trying to papers, sound fancy but instead making no sense. The sentence should read: In studying widgetry, one should be aware of the thesis statements paper, two systems of widgetry; fingleish and fnordleish. It was thought that Jones hated his stepfather and his mother, partly for abandoning him at such a young age.

Who thought so? This entire statement, which implies something that cannot be proven and is thus not a basic fact, had no attribution in the essay. Since it was about someone historical and the student couldn't possibly have known this unless they got it from a source, it was plagiarism to include it without attribution. Smith managed one friendship through this time and the value of that is always questioned. Who is questioning the value? There is no attribution to explain who questions it or to prove that it is questioned by anyone other than the student.

What precisely is being questioned? The value of only having one friend, or the value of the one friendship to Smith in particular? . which means that the cut in the # of points is equal to the degree of the curve. Using the # symbol instead of the word number is a bad short cut, and certainly inappropriate for a formal essay. Smith also helped to improve the scientific community ; his focus was mainly regarding widgetry. How does a focus on a subject help to improve a community?

It might improve the understanding of the subject in research on electronic voting, the community, but does that improve the community itself? This is a badly worded assertion. If it truly did benefit the scientific community as a whole, the thesis statements, student should cite a source demonstrating that to research papers on electronic, be the case. Existence Philosophy? No attribution was present. In one day, John's attitude towards school changed for the better. A boy ranked just above him kicked him in the stomach. At the voting, end of the day John challenged the existence of god philosophy, boy to a fight. Research? Even though John was much smaller than his opponent, his determination overtook the boy. Winning the problems, fight was still not enough.

John applied himself in class, and soon became the top student in the school. This entire paragraph introduces an papers anecdote for the purpose of explaining what drove John to become a better student. Conventional Essay? Incredibly, it manages to completely fail to mention the relationship between the research, anecdote and John's new-found classroom enthusiasm. The relationship is implied and the reader can guess that John wished to beat the boy in more than just a physical fight, and thus worked hard to outrank the boy in the classroom, but that is not stated. Essay? The paragraph is very choppy and papers voting the sentences do not flow well. Read it out loud, and you'll hear how it sounds like a grade school book instead of a university essay. During this time, Smith constructed a water clock. He constructed the clock out of an old box.

This is choppy. It could be easily combined into one sentence. Jones became began to study motion. This error was probably due to making, a sentence that once legitimately contained the papers, word became being edited without became being removed. If the student had read the essay out loud or given it to a friend to read, this error likely would have been noticed. Yet, in thesis in conclusion, 1679, Jones would discover that his initial calculation the papers, Moon's distance from Earth was incorrect. Here is another example of a simple error of omission that could have been caught if the student had read the conventional farming, essay aloud or given it to a friend to read. Research Papers? The word of statements should be between calculation and the. That one small error makes the entire sentence awkward and papers confusing. If the instructor has to reread the sentence to try to understand its meaning, the problems in materialism and culture essays, flow of the essay is research, interrupted.

If this happens often enough in the essay, it gives an overall bad impression on what otherwise might be a very good paper in terms of research. More examples of errors that could have been caught if the students had bothered to read their essay: One of Smith's main contribution was his use of. Widgetry emphasized the notion of the infinite widget, which in farming essay, fact cam as a great service to Smith in that it served as an important too in helping explain his branch of widgetry. Jones might have in fact perputuated the ideas, but he was also at a loss when he could not make good sense of them from the research, beginning. Admiration for Smith grew in problems in materialism selected essays, the filed of widgetry. With Jones' encouragement, Smith drafter a number of monographs on religious topics. Smith considers out universe to be a gravitational system. On August 10, 1777, Jones was ent a letter from. In later research , it was proven that Jones was incorrect and science rejected his theories about light until the next century. Thus, it was scientifically proven that Jones' theories about quanta (tiny particulate packets of energy) were indeed correct . The wave formulation was also correct . When was this later research?

Who performed the research? In discussing whether someone was proven incorrect or not, it is a good idea to fully explain who did the research papers on electronic voting, proving when, and possibly even how they came to thesis for arumentative research, their conclusion. These sentences contradict each other. Was Jones proven incorrect or correct? Does the student mean that Jones was erroneously proven incorrect, but science later found that he was correct after all? Or was Jones correct about some things and research on electronic voting not others? The use of Thus implies causality. Thesis Statements? How does the proof that Jones is incorrect and the rejection by science suddenly become scientific proof of his theory being correct? Regardless of what the student meant by the flip from incorrect to correct, there is nothing given to on electronic, establish causality. It's disappointing to see such sloppiness as this in vs organic, an essay.

This particular essay featured clipart, so it was obviously done on a computer with a modern word processor. Research Papers On Electronic Voting? It clearly wasn't spell-checked. Such complete disregard is thesis, automatically indicative of a student who doesn't care about research papers voting, their final product, and while the error itself is minor, it gives a bad impression to statements, the grader. In fact, this essay had several spelling errors that could have been caught. Research Papers On Electronic? That's inexcusable at the university level. It was also during this time that he traveled to problems in materialism selected, his uncle's place in Brunswick.

Place is colloquial. Use home, apartment, residence or other such appropriate word instead. Smith attempted to obtain his doctorate of research papers voting law degree at the University of references Anytown but was denied because positions were being held for research, the older students -- and Smith was much too young. Making Thesis? Smith's secretary claims that he was told many times, however, that Smith was denied admission because of research on electronic negative feelings that the Dean's wife held for references essay, him. Smith's secretary is probably dead, since this essay is about someone from the 19th century. Therefore, they no longer claim anything. It should be past tense. Since the student doesn't cite this, there is an implication that perhaps the secretary is not dead and the student went so far as to interview the secretary personally. That is, of course, quite unlikely, meaning that this student has plagiarised this information from one of their sources.

The following are a few concepts that form the basis of Leibnizian calculus: [followed by three bulleted paragraphs comprised mostly of direct quotation] Using bullets in a formal essay is papers on electronic, rarely appropriate. It is preferable to write out the bulleted information into proper paragraph form. This student seems to conventional vs organic, have been too lazy to bother paraphrasing a bunch of direct quotations into a formal essay structure. Along came the Joe Smith, a mathematician considered by numerous scholars to be a pioneer of calculus, including other renowned mathematician, Bill Jones. The Joe Smith? There has only been one? The student means another, not other.

Sloppy. The first page of the essay starts with: have been developed (5). The second page starts with the header Introduction and the opening paragraph. Clearly, the on electronic, student stapled the references essay, pages out of order. What a sloppy mistake! Pages should be numbered unless you're specifically instructed not to research papers on electronic voting, for some reason, and you should always ensure that all of the pages are present and in proper order before binding the essay. If the instructor has to begin by figuring out essay, what the heck is going on, they will automatically have a bad impression of your essay and possibly of you. Jones was quite a busy man in that along with his position in the Court of Mainz, he also managed to on electronic voting, serve as Baron Johann Christian von Boineburg as secretary, librarian, lawyer, advisor, assistant, and most importantly, friend. Quite a busy man is a bit colloquial. Restated In Conclusion? A busy man would do. Research Papers Voting? The first as is an error, since Jones did not serve as the Baron, he served the Baron.

This may have been caught if the philosophy, student had read their essay out loud. His Chummy, Bill Jones, who Smith shared a room with until his resignation from this fellowship in 1683. Chummy should only be included if it was Smith's actual word for research on electronic, Jones. If this is the case, it is a quotation from for arumentative, a source and should be cited. If not, it is colloquial and should just say His friend Bill Jones. Who should be whom in this case. A site called Grammar and Style has information on how to use who and whom. This isn't even a complete sentence. Smith was born prematurely and was so small when he was born that they thought he might not live. Repeating that he was born is redundant.

Who does they refer to? Doctors? Parents? Relatives? Townsfolk? It is a pronoun without an antecedent. In this publication, Jones has a discourse between the research on electronic voting, belief systems of the natural philosophical world around him. Has is the wrong word here because the essay is about a person who is now dead. Dead people don't have discourse with anyone in thesis for arumentative, the present, so the word should at least be had.

But even had is research on electronic voting, awkward, and for arumentative research paper a better word would be wrote. Discourse means to converse, especially orally. One does not speak orally in a publication. It is written. This word should be omitted. Between denotes at papers voting, least two participants, but Jones is the only one having the supposed discourse. This too should be omitted. Natural philosophical world is restated thesis in conclusion, confusing.

Does the research papers on electronic voting, student mean the natural, philosophical world, which would be the world described as both natural and philosophical? Or do they mean natural philosophical world, in which natural modifies philosophical and not world, in which case the grammatically correct phrase would be naturally philosophical world? This would be better written as: In this publication, Jones wrote of the belief systems of the natural, philosophical world around him. or, depending on the answer to the fourth point: In this publication, Jones wrote of the belief systems of the naturally philosophical world around him. He was home for approximately 18 months, according to Jones the 18 months was the most predominant time period of his life. This is a run-on sentence.

It should either end between 18 months and according, or it should be rewritten to make it a proper sentence. 18 months is repeated for no reason. 18 months is plural, so it should be 18 months were not 18 months was. Predominant means superior especially in power or numbers. Something cannot be most superior. Most should be omitted.

Predominant is not the references essay, best word in on electronic voting, this case anyway. If the student means it was the most powerful time of Jones' life, they should be clear about restated, that. If they mean it was the most superior numerical time of his life, then he logically cannot have been more than 36 months old. Simpson was content after his ability to reproduce Smith's experiment. Jones was not that easy, the two men fought constantly. The student probably means that Simpson was content once he was able to reproduce Smith's experiment.

The current phrasing doesn't quite say that, and is awkward and confusing. Jones was not that easy to what? The student probably means Jones was not that easy to papers on electronic, satisfy or something equivalent. This is a run-on sentence. It should end after easy, or be rewritten to be grammatically correct. Which two men?

Simpson and making thesis Jones or Smith and Jones? The information on physics before this section is important to understanding whom Newton was, but arguably, his greatest advancements were in the field of mathematics, most importantly Calculus. Incorrect use of research papers whom. Should be who. In Materialism And Culture? A site called Grammar and research papers voting Style has information on how to use who and whom. There should not be a comma between arguably and in materialism and culture selected his. There is no citation as to anyone arguing that Newton's greatest advancements were in mathematics. This might be because it would be difficult to prove in the face of the importance of Newtonian physics. Advancements is probably the wrong word. Achievements or discoveries would be better.

Newton's advancements are more likely to be funds paid in advance of publication. The addition of most importantly is awkward. Particularly would have been a better word. The use of greatest and most importantly referring to Calculus is hyperbole. Given that this essay was for a Calculus class, it sounds like a kiss-up. The declarations of superiority are superfluous, unattributed, probably erroneous, and possibly pandering. It's all very ugly. A concluding sentence: Smith's great work, theories, and studies will continue to live on forever in the ever-changing world of science and mathematics . How can the research, student know that Smith's work will live on forever? That's an impossible assertion to make.

Work, theories and studies don't live. They exist, but they are not organic creatures. If the world is thesis statements paper, ever-changing, how again can the student know that Smith's work won't one day be considered nonsense? Or lost entirely? World is singular, but it refers to two worlds, one of science and one of mathematics. This conclusion reeks of hyperbole. Papers Voting? (So does the phrase reeks of for arumentative hyperbole, but this is not a formal essay.) A scientist before Smith by the name of Jones knew that he could demonstrate the ration between two infinite sums. The phrasing here is a bit awkward.

It would be better phrased: Jones, a predecessor of Smith, knew that. Ration is the wrong word. The student meant ratio. This is one of those errors that a spell-check cannot find, but if the essay had been read aloud it may have been noticed. One man was proclaiming to research papers on electronic, be the inventor of the widgetiscope and another man was proclaiming the restated, exact same thing; who is papers, telling the thesis in conclusion, truth? The main problem here is the papers, change in tense. You can't go from was to is if the subject remains fixed in time. Furthermore, it is incorrect to refer to someone who is dead as doing anything in of god philosophy, the present besides being dead (and possibly rotting). A dead person is not telling anything right now, but they were in the past.

Try to avoid using the passive form was proclaiming and instead use proclaimed. Research Voting? This particular statement is also bad because of the subject matter. Existence Essay? The student has already shown in research, the essay that both men happened to independently invent the widgetiscope, but the issue is who deserved the title for inventing it first . So actually, neither one was necessarily lying, and the student should not make it appear that one or the statements, other may have been doing so. You must be careful not to libel people. Research Papers On Electronic? The phrasing here is awkward and possibly a bit too conversational in the final question. A better way of writing this would be: Two men proclaimed to be the inventor of calculus, but only one could be given the credit.

The argument was so drawn out that a decision was not easy to references, come by which worked against Smith's favor. Jones had been considered the sole inventor of the widgetiscope for fifteen years already, which gave him the upper hand. The student meant to say that the duration of the argument caused Smith to lose. Papers On Electronic? But because the student failed to put the necessary comma between the bolded words, this sentence actually says, by means of a complicated string of making thesis multiple negatives, that it was not easy to research papers on electronic, come to a decision against Smith, meaning he won. References? This sentence would be better worded this way: Because the argument took so long, Smith lost. But then, at the beginning of the next paragraph, the student writes: The argument took years to on electronic voting, unravel and never really came to a definitive decision. This negates what the student had asserted before: that Smith lost because of the duration of the argument. This also repeats the fact that it was a long argument, which is thesis statements, redundant.

It was from the Greeks, where the underlying of widgetry emerged and set the basis of research papers on electronic voting what widgetry has become. The Greeks are a people, not a place, so things come from whom, not where. The comma in this sentence should not be there. It sets up an expectation that the portion after the comma is a separate clause, as in: It was from the Greeks, who also invented blodgetry, that widgetry came forth. Note that because the who is in the separate clause, it should not be whom. The underlying what ? You can't just say the underlying of widgetry. It has to restated thesis in conclusion, be the research voting, underlying something of widgetry, whether that something is and culture, basis, foundation, etc. Although there was a time of papers on electronic intellectual heightening , there came a period of darkness in the development of mathematics (Ewards 45) . Intellectual heightening is an icky, awkward phrase.

Intellectual development would have been much better. In going over this old essay, I wondered if perhaps this was a typo of the name Edwards. I checked the bibliography to confirm the statements research, name, and discovered that nothing by research papers voting Ewards, Edwards, or any similar name was there at all. Had this gone noticed when the paper was being graded, serious questions would have been raised as to the validity of the student's sources and existence philosophy bibliography. Be sure to list all sources in research, your bibliography, and be sure to vs organic, spell them correctly when citing! One motive of Sumerian algebra was to impose on themselves a concepts that they could not fully understand and precisely compute, and for this reason, rejected concepts of irrational as numbers, all traces of the research on electronic, infinite, such as limit concepts, from their own mathematics. Motive applies to Sumerian algebra, not Sumerians.

Therefore, that motive cannot be imposed on in materialism selected essays themselves. It should be written: One motive of the Sumerians concerning their algebra was to impose on themselves. although that is still an awkward phrase. Concepts should not be plural. Research Papers Voting? This is making thesis, sloppiness that probably could have been detected if the student had bothered to read over his essay. The sentence should end after compute. A new sentence should begin, For this reason. The word they should be put between reason and rejected to say: For this reason, they rejected concepts.

This sentence is so garbled with mismatched subclauses that adding another is just icky. I'd put such as limit concepts in parenthesis, or rewrite the sentence to bring that idea out on its own. If Greek rigor had surmounted their need to succeed in these elements and refused to use real numbers and limits till they had finally understood them, calculus may have never formed and papers voting mathematics as a whole would be obsolete (Apostal 102). The verb refused applies to Greek rigor, not Greeks, which is nonsensical. Be careful to ensure that your verbs match the existence, subject you intend for them. Don't use till when you mean until. That's colloquial at best, and papers on electronic voting not really a proper use of the references essay, word at all at worst. Research Papers? The proper phrase is have never been formed.

To say something never formed begs the question: What didn't it form? Even though there is a citation for this extreme declaration that mathematics as a whole would be obsolete, it's still probably hyperbole. I wonder if the source actually said that, or if the student's paraphrasing has overstated the source's point that mathematics might be different without the advent of calculus. Problems And Culture? Be careful that you don't paraphrase in research papers on electronic, such a way as to claim a source said something that they did not. If this source really says mathematics would be obsolete without calculus, it's a bad source. Such a statement would render even basic arithmetic and counting as obsolete, which is essay, ridiculous. Essentially , it is research papers, a case of thesis paper Smith's word against a number of papers on electronic suspicious details pointing against him. He acknowledged possession of a copy of part of one of statements Jones' manuscripts, on more than one occasion he deliberately altered or added to important documents before publishing them, and a material date I none of his manuscripts had been falsified (1675 had been changed to 1673) (Bogus, 78) Essentially isn't technically incorrect here, but students do have a tendency to use words like essentially and basically too often. It's somewhat conversational, and possibly colloquial. Try to papers, avoid it unless something is truly essential.

A number of suspicious details pointing against farming him is an awkward way of on electronic voting saying: suspicions of his guilt. But what the of god philosophy, student means is not suspicions, but points of research voting evidence. When you list several examples of something you've indicated, the way to punctuate it is as follows (note the placement of the colon and subsequent semicolons): [Point being made]:[proof 1];[proof 2];[proof 3]; and[proof 4]. This way each proof can have punctuation such as commas without being confused with other points, and each proof still points to the main part of the sentence. This entire thing should be rewritten to say: It is a case of Smith's word against restated in conclusion the evidence of his guilt: he acknowledged possession of a copy of Jones' manuscripts; on more than one occasion he deliberately altered or added to research on electronic voting, important documents before publishing them; and his manuscripts had been falsified by changing 1675 to 1673 (Bogus, 78).

After quoting a dictionary definition: The editors of the famous dictionary are probably unaware of the fact that they have just committed a cardinal sin in the mathematical world , in that they only described fingleish widgetry, and failed to include an explanation of fnordleish widgetry. It's okay to question a source, and at references essay, higher levels of education it might even be required. But if you're going to do it, be careful to do it well and with evidence. This just sounds presumptuous. Research Papers Voting? The student has not shown whether or not the dictionary has separate definitions for widgetry or otherwise accounts for its apparent lack of sufficient definition. Saying the dictionary is famous is probably unnecessary, and possibly hyperbole.

A cardinal sin is a sin of fundamental importance. In the Judeo-Christian context, this would mean something very bad, like murder. Thus, calling a disagreement in definition in and culture selected essays, a dictionary a cardinal sin is definitely hyperbole. Even if it was a cardinal sin, the sin was committed in the dictionary, not in the mathematical world. The student meant against the mathematical world.

It is surprising how people could be satisfied such a vague definition, as was the case in research papers on electronic, Webster's Dictionary, on a subject that has tested such great minds for centuries upon centuries . It is surprising how students could be satisfied with such drivel in their essays. That sounds nasty, doesn't it? That's because it is. Sentences like this are insulting and off-putting, and thesis in conclusion don't belong in a formal essay. Such great minds requires an example. The word such should be omitted. Centuries upon centuries is redundant. Just say centuries and leave it at that.

Jones' first object in Paris was to make contact with the French government but, while waiting for such an opportunity, he made contact with mathematicians and research voting philosophers there, in particular Davis and essay Myers, discussing with Davis a variety of topics but particularly church reunification (Bugle 57). An object is a thing. Research? The student means Jones' first objective. This is a bad run-on. In Materialism And Culture? It should be broken up like this: Jones' first objective in Paris was to make contact with the French government, but while waiting for an opportunity to papers voting, do so, he made contact with mathematicians and philosophers such as Davis and references Myers. He discussed a variety of topics with Davis, particularly church reunification (Bugle 57). Smith's contribution to math has helped our society become more technological in building things . In this particular case, Smith made many contributions, not just one. Math is the colloquial version of mathematics. Did Smith's contributions only on electronic help our society?

What about other societies? More technological in building things is a really awkward way of saying improved our technological aptitude. Undoubtedly, Jones was one of the greatest geniuses that ever lived and this paper will demonstrate that, starting from his childhood until his death . Smith may have been a genius, but to blow that up to one of the references essay, greatest geniuses that ever lived is hyperbole. Even if it is true, the research papers on electronic voting, paper didn't demonstrate it because the paper didn't compare Smith to other great geniuses that have lived. The paper showed that Smith was a genius, perhaps, but not his rank amongst all of the geniuses that have ever lived. Of God Essay? If you start from something, you go to or follow through to another something. The phrase starting from his childhood until his death actually means you're starting from the research papers voting, section of time inclusively between his childhood and death and not saying where you're going. Furthermore, the paper does not start from Smith's childhood because it was not being written when Smith was a child. Vs Organic Farming Essay? The student means, starting with his childhood and following through to his death. Research On Electronic Voting? That is still awkward, and the sentence would be best written:

Undoubtedly, Jones was a genius, and this paper will demonstrate that by examining his entire life. So John lived for seven years with his mother's parents who did not really show him any affection . So in this context is restated in conclusion, colloquial and should be omitted. This really should be cited. John's address may be a matter of public record and therefore doesn't have to be cited, but comments on the emotional quality of the household imply research, and the student should give credit to research, the source. Really is statements for arumentative research, colloquial, and should be omitted. While at Cambridge, Smith's genius was most productive in his dedication to papers on electronic voting, math . Who is Smith's genius?

The student means Smith's intellect, but an intellect cannot be productive. It facilitates productivity, but it is references essay, not productive itself. Research On Electronic? A better way to essay, write this would be: Smith's intellect was best displayed in papers voting, his dedication. Math is colloquial. It should be mathematics. This information helps us to understand how we, as humans stay on the ground; we are matter as well and do have an invisible force weighing us down as we push against it and it pushes back against us . This hand full of knowledge has helped our scientist understand our universe of heavenly bodies and essay their movement. It has also allowed scientist to delve further in exploring our galaxy. Does gravity only affect humans?

Granted, the student is trying to papers on electronic voting, make the vs organic essay, science seem more personal, but this is an awkward way of doing it. It is papers, also something that seems to indicate an vs organic essay essay geared to children. While you should usually write essays so they can be understood by laypersons, you can assume those laypersons are your age and intellectual peers. The description of the papers, invisible force is very awkward. A better wording would be: do have an invisible force that we push against as it pushes back against us. Gravity does not, in fact, weigh people down. The student's own definition of in materialism and culture it earlier in the essay mentions this, and papers on electronic voting here too it is accurately described as a push, not a pull. To add in the bit about it weighing us down is farming essay, contradictory. The student means handful. This is research papers on electronic, a bad description anyway, since the student is existence of god philosophy, trying to show how this knowledge is monumental to scientists. Both instances of scientist should be pluralized.

One delves further into something, not in it. The Royal Society always had someone coming in each week they met to show off their invention . Always had someone coming in is colloquial and awkward. It should say: The Royal Society hosted a guest each week. The second part of this is a separate sentence and should be capitalized and punctuated accordingly, or else brought into research papers the first sentence with appropriate conjunctions. Show off is colloquial. Demonstrate would be better. In Conclusion? Since more than one invention was demonstrated, invention should be plural. A concluding paragraph:

Jones was a great man who made an impact in all of our lives . He is recognized as one of the centuries brilliant-minded people who helped to further math along. This intellectual man has created something which has and papers on electronic voting will be used for years to come. This is an important part of history which will and should never be forgotten. The essay has shown that Jones was brilliant and invented some useful things. It has not, however, demonstrated that he was a great man. Problems Essays? A great man is one that embodies greatness in all things, including attitude, relationships with others, and their contributions to their society. Jones may have been all of this, but the essay did not reflect it, so it is hyperbole to declare it in the conclusion. It is research on electronic voting, also a highly subjective comment; what makes someone great to references essay, one person may not for on electronic, another.

Centuries is the plural of problems and culture essays century, not the possessive. The student means century's. But Jones was not of our current century, so the research papers, student should define which century they mean. Impacts are made on, not in. If by of god all of us the student means everyone on the planet, this is incorrect. Jones' contributions to mathematics hardly impact the life of someone living in research papers voting, a non-literate, non-industrialized society. Even if the student merely means her peers, it is still hyperbole to declare that everyone has been impacted. References? If you're going to mention that the person did something in your conclusion, mention what that something is. While it is papers voting, unlikely that Jones' history will be forgotten, the student cannot effectively predict the future in this way. Some of these comments may seem nitpicky, but the fact of the matter is errors such as these reflect poorly on you and and culture essays your essay. No one is perfect, and an essay with one or two awkward phrases won't be marked down just for those instances.

But an essay that is on electronic, full of the errors listed above prevents the reader from understanding the content. Making Statements? If the instructor doesn't know what you mean, they can't possibly give you a good grade. Last updated in February 2005. Copyright #169 2000-2005 Kimberly Chapman. All rights reserved. This original work is available for distribution, provided the following: it is papers on electronic, only distributed in this complete form, it contains my name and copyright, it is not altered during distribution without my consent, and statements it is not used to generate income for anyone without my consent. I would strongly appreciate knowing if anyone is distributing this in printed form. If you want to receive notification of updates on any portion of this site, simply enter your email address here and papers on electronic click/select the button to enter. You will be required to sign up for a free Yahoo! account to essay, complete registration.

Please note that Yahoo!'s privacy policy and voting other management are outside of restated thesis in conclusion's responsibility. Users are encouraged to perform their own due diligence before signing up with any online service. To find out on electronic, more about the list or read messages without signing up, please visit the Yahoo! page for the kimberlychapman updates mailing list.

Write My Research Paper for Me -
Practical Attacks on Real-world E-voting - J Alex Halderman

7 Creative Ways to use YouTube Annotations. Research Papers On Electronic. YouTube annotations are a great way to achieve a variety of essay, goals within your videos beyond just sending people back to your website. If you want to really ensure that your videos keep viewers hooked, drive traffic to your website, and turn into business leads, here are seven creative ways to research papers on electronic, use YouTube annotations to do so. Keep viewers tuned in to restated thesis in conclusion, your videos. Statistics have shown that you can expect to lose 20% of your audience within the first 10 seconds of video playback.

Drop-off continues at a rate of 33% by 30 seconds and papers on electronic, 44% by 60 seconds. Of course, benchmark statistics aren’t applicable to every video. To find out what your drop-off rates are, look at your top video’s audience retention statistics to see how long you are keeping your audience. Fortunately, annotations can help keep people on your video or (at minimum) on your channel. Here are a few different ways to use them to keep your viewers tuned in. Existence Essay. It’s not always possible to research papers on electronic voting, create a 30 second video that encompasses the entirety of your message. But it is possible to let your viewers turn a two-minute video into a much shorter one without leaving. For example, let’s say you’re going to show people how to create a DIY air conditioner for camping.

The video has three parts – how it works, what tools and supplies you’ll need, and philosophy, how to research papers voting, put it together. As you start explaining how it works, you add an annotation that says “Next: The Tools You’ll Need.” As you start showing the tools and supplies, you add an annotation that says “Next: How to Put It Together.” By doing this, you give viewers the making statements chance to effectively “scan the research papers on electronic headlines” and get to exactly what they want without getting distracted or looking for another video that will more concisely cover the topic. At the same time, people who want to see everything will be able to. You score a win for both audiences! Here#8217;s a great example of this technique in action#8230; 2. Show viewers related videos throughout. For Arumentative Research. Have you ever started to watch a video and realized you meant to research papers voting, look for something else? That’s a common reason for people to abandon your videos, and it’s one you can solve with annotations. For example, let’s say you’re going to teach people how to tie a necktie with the essay Eldredge knot. But you know that some of research papers on electronic voting, your viewers will realize when they see it that they would rather do a Windsor knot. No problem.

Shortly after you’ve shown what a Eldredge knot looks like, you add an annotation that says “Looking for a Windsor knot?” By doing this, you give viewers who might have stumbled onto the wrong video to for arumentative paper, find the right one on research papers voting your channel, instead of making thesis statements, searching for another from someone else’s channel. This keeps them with your brand! 3. Voting. Create your own suggested videos at the end. Even if you have a few other videos on your YouTube channel, YouTube might not always choose them at essay the end for the suggested videos grid. While you can share your YouTube video link with a ?rel=0 at the end in an attempt to hide those, or embed your video on your website with suggested videos disabled, viewers will still see them on YouTube itself. Papers On Electronic Voting. So instead, why not create your own suggested videos? To do this, you’ll need thumbnails from the videos you want to suggest, and you’ll want to references essay, place those thumbnails on an image that is the same resolution as your video. Add that image to the end of papers on electronic voting, your video, and then in YouTube, use the making thesis spotlight annotation to link each of the thumbnails to the corresponding videos on YouTube. The result? Custom picked suggested videos at research on electronic the end of each of your videos that take people to more of your videos. On YouTube itself, viewers will still see YouTube’s choice of suggested videos after yours, unless they’ve already clicked on one of your suggestions.

Create calls to statements, action at voting the right times. Restated Thesis In Conclusion. As mentioned before, you can’t guarantee that your audience will still be watching by the end of your video, which is why you can’t rely on a call to action slide at the very end. Annotations allow you to add the right calls to research on electronic, action at the right times through the video. In Conclusion. Here are a few calls to action to papers on electronic, try (and when). Vs Organic Farming. When people are watching a video, they may want to continue learning about your video’s content, but may not have the time to do it through video. Or maybe they would prefer to read more instead. Adding a learn more annotation that links back to your website and the content your video covers could turn a video abandon into new business.

On the other hand, if someone does make it to the end of your video, they are going to want more. If you don’t have an official opt-in, you can always use this point to papers on electronic, ask viewers to subscribe to your YouTube channel. But if you do have an opt-in, getting your viewer back to your website to subscribe or contact you for more information is restated key. Use an annotation that links to your opt-in or contact form to turn viewers into true leads. What if you don’t want passive viewers who may leave the video up and running, but may not be paying attention to it. You want active viewers who are going to watch every moment of voting, your video. You can use annotations to give viewers control of their video-watching destiny.

Here are few ideas to try. 6. Let your viewers answer questions. Making Thesis. Let’s say that you are creating a product demo. Instead of research, running through the references essay product’s standard features, start out by asking the viewer what they need the most help with. Put a few answers on a stationary image, and using the spotlight annotation, link each answer to a different section of the video. If they don’t make a choice, then they get taken through the research on electronic voting demo as usual. But if they do, they will get taken to a specific part of the demo that helps with their pain points. At the end of selected, each portion of the demo, allow the viewer to research, choose another pain point to address, or give them another annotation that allows them to either sign up for a free trial or contact you for more information. 7. Let your viewers choose their own adventure.

Choose your own adventure books are always popular with kids, and they can help your video viewers get excited too. If you can think of a creative way to put people in control of the outcome of the video, then they are that much more likely to finish it. As an in materialism essays added bonus, thinking of different outcomes for your videos is research papers going to help you come up with even more video content ideas! Here#8217;s a great example of restated thesis in conclusion, annotations that let viewers choose their own ending for the video#8230; Annotations in Action. Ready to see some more great annotations in papers on electronic voting action? Here’s a YouTube Spotlight playlist of how video creators have put annotations to philosophy, use in a variety of ways, from product demos to fun interactive videos. Take the above ideas suggested, combine them with the creativity of the annotations in research papers on electronic this playlist, and see what kind of viewer engagement you can get with your YouTube videos! Last, but not least, here are some informative YouTube help articles all about annotations and creative ways to use them. YouTube Annotations Playbook – A visual guide to annotations, how to create them, and some useful examples. Create and Edit Annotations – A basic guide to setting up annotations on restated thesis in conclusion your videos.

Advanced Tips for Annotations – Specific tips on annotations that viewers like (and don’t), usage and formatting, relevancy, link annotations, and text annotations. Research Papers On Electronic. Associated Website Annotations – If you want to link to your website with annotations, here’s a guide on how to set up your website as an associated website for restated thesis in conclusion your YouTube channel. Research. Merch Annotations – Promote licensed merchandise on your videos using annotations from approved retailers listed on this page. Problems In Materialism. Kristi Hines is a freelance writer, professional blogger, and social media enthusiast. Her blog Kikolani focuses on blog marketing for personal, professional, and business bloggers.

You can follow her on Google+, Twitter, and Facebook. Great article but to bad Annotations don#8217;t work in the Viewbix player! better fix your pop-up subscribe. Papers. generates a mailchimp error.

Buy Essay Online Cheap -
The Technical Feasibility and Security of E-Voting

example phd proposal Sample Proposals for the Undergraduate Engineering Review. Before an article, report, or brief is research accepted into the Undergraduate Engineering Review, the author must first submit a proposal that specifies the importance of the research, the scope and limitations of the research, and the methods for existence of god philosophy the research. Papers Voting! Submitters should read the journal's Request for existence philosophy Proposals before submitting. A Proposal to Research the Storage Facility.

for Spent Nuclear Fuel at Yucca Mountain. There are many questions regarding the safety of the Yucca Mountain waste repository. Researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory disagree over the long-term safety of the proposed high level nuclear waste site located in Nevada. In 1994, Charles Bowman, a researcher at Los Alamos, developed a theory claiming that years of research on electronic voting storing waste in the mountain may actually start a nuclear chain reaction and explode, similar to an atomic bomb [Taubes, 1995]. The stir caused by theory suggests that researchers have not explored all sides of the safety issue concerning potentially hazardous situations at Yucca Mountain. Bowman's theory that Yucca Mountain could explode is and culture selected based upon the idea that enough waste will eventually disperse through the rock to create a critical mass. Voting! A critical mass is an amount of fissile material, such as plutonium, containing enough mass to existence of god philosophy start a neutron chain reaction [Murray, 1989]. Bowman argues that if this chain reaction were started underground, the research papers on electronic rocks in the ground would help keep the system compressed and speed up the chain reaction [Taubes, 1995]. A chain reaction formed underground could then generate huge amounts of energy in a fraction of problems and culture selected essays a second, resulting in a nuclear blast. A nuclear explosion of this magnitude would emit large amounts of on electronic voting radioactivity into the air and ground water.

Another safety concern is the possibility of a volcanic eruption in Yucca Mountain. The long-term nuclear waste storage facility needs to remain stable for at least 10,000 years to allow the radioactive isotopes to decay to natural levels [Clark, 1997]. There are at in materialism essays, least a dozen young volcanoes within 40 kilometers of the papers voting proposed Yucca Mountain waste site [Weiss, 1996]. The proximity of Yucca Mountain to these volcanoes makes it possible to have a volcanic eruption pass through the making spent fuel waste repository. Research On Electronic! Such a volcanic eruption could release damaging amounts of problems in materialism and culture selected radioactivity to research papers on electronic the environment. (1) explain the criteria for a suitable repository of essay high-level radioactive waste; and. (2) determine whether Yucca Mountain meets these criteria. According to the Department of Energy (DOE), a repository for high-level radioactive waste must meet several criteria including safety, location, and economics [Roush, 1995].

Safety includes not only the effect of the repository on people near the site, but also people along the research papers on electronic voting transportation routes to the site. Statements For Arumentative Research Paper! In my research I will consider both groups of on electronic voting people. As far as location, a waste site cannot be in farming essay an area with a large population or near a ground water supply. Also, because one of the most significant factors in determining the research life span of a possible repository is how long the waste storage canisters will remain in tact, the waste site must be located in a dry climate to eliminate the moisture that can cause the waste canisters to corrode. Problems And Culture Essays! The economics involved in selecting a site is another criterion. At present, the Department of Energy (DOE) has spent more than 1.7 billion dollars on the Yucca Mountain project [Taubes, 1995]. For that reason, much pressure exists to papers select Yucca Mountain as a repository site; otherwise, this money would have been wasted.

Other costs, though, have to be considered. For instance, how economical is farming essay it to transport radioactive waste across several states to a single national site? I will try to account for as many of these other costs as possible. After explaining the criteria, I will assess how well Yucca Mountain meets those criteria. In this assessment, I will not assign a numerical score for each criterion. Rather, I will discuss qualitatively how well Yucca Mountain meets each criterion. Papers On Electronic Voting! In some situations, disagreement exists among experts as to how well Yucca Mountain meets a criterion.

In such cases, I will present both sides. In this assessment, only Yucca Mountain will be considered as a possible site. Although many sites in the United States could meet the DOE's established criteria, I will consider only Yucca Mountain because the DOE is considering only Yucca Mountain [Taube, 1995]. The first goal of my research is to explain the criteria for determining whether a nuclear waste repository is for arumentative research paper suitable. For example, will the rock structure be able to withstand human invasion in the future [Clark, 1997]? What will happen if the papers on electronic voting waste containers corrode and do not last as long as predicted? Will the natural setting contain the waste? To achieve this goal, I will rely on Background on 40 CFR Part 197 Environmental Standards for essay Yucca Mountain [Clark, 1997], the DOE Yucca Mountain home page [1997], and the book Understanding Radioactive Waste [Murray, 1989]. A second goal of research my literature review is to evaluate Yucca Mountain meets those criteria. I will base my evaluation on the sources mentioned above as well as specific Environmental Protection Agency standards. I also intend to research the validity of possible environmental disasters, such as the explosion theory.

To accomplish this goal, I will rely on existence, the paper presented by Clark [1997], and on the book Blowup at voting, Yucca Mountain [Taubes, 1995]. Because engineering students are the primary audience for my proposed research topic and may not be familiar with the history of nuclear waste, I will provide a background on restated thesis in conclusion, past methods used for waste storage. People in the nuclear field with some knowledge of the waste problem facing the industry may be a secondary audience. Figure 1. Schedule for completion of the literature review. The formal presentation will be on October 27, and the formal report will be completed by research papers voting December 5.

Given that all my sources are available through the University of Wisconsin library system, there is no appreciable cost associated with performing this review, unless one takes into statements paper, consideration the research papers on electronic amount of tuition spent on maintaining the university libraries. The only other minor costs are photocopying articles, creating transparencies for my presentation, printing my report, and binding my report. I estimate these expenses will not exceed $20. I am a senior in the Engineering Physics Department at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, majoring in nuclear engineering and physics. I have taken several classes related to nuclear waste, economics, and environmental studies. Thesis! I believe that these courses will aid me in preparing the research proposed review. For further information about my qualifications, see the attached resume. Kerr, R., New Way to Ask the Experts: Rating Radioactive Waste Risks, Science, vol.274, (November1996), pp. Making Statements! 913-914. Murray, Raymond L., Understanding Nuclear Waste (Battelle Press, 1989). Roush, W., Can Nuclear Waste Keep Yucca Mountain Dry-and Safe?

Science, vol. 270, (December 1995), pp. 1761-1762. Taubes, G., Blowup at papers, Yucca Mountain, Science, vol.268, (June 1995), pp. 1836-1839. A Proposal to Review How Geophysical Precursors. Can Help Predict Earthquakes.

Throughout the world, devastating earthquakes occur with little or no advance warning. Some of these earthquakes kill hundreds of conventional people. Research On Electronic Voting! If the times, magnitudes, and locations of these earthquakes could be accurately predicted, many lives could be saved. Of God Philosophy Essay! This document proposes a review of how monitoring geophysical precursors can help in the short-term prediction of earthquakes. The proposed review will discuss the physical principles behind the monitoring of three common precursors and evaluate how accurate each monitoring is in predicting earthquakes. Papers Voting! Included in this proposal are my methods for thesis in conclusion gathering information, a schedule for research voting completing the review, and my qualifications. On the morning of April 18, 1906, the population of San Francisco was awakened by violent shaking and by the roar caused by the writhing and collapsing of buildings [Hodgson, 1964]. The ground appeared to be thrown into waves that twisted railways and broke the pavement into great cracks. Many buildings collapsed, while others were severely damaged.

The earthquake caused fires in fifty or more points throughout the city. Fire stations were destroyed, alarms were put out of commission, and water mains were broken. Vs Organic Essay! As a result, the fires quickly spread throughout the papers on electronic city and continued for references three days. The fires destroyed a 5 square-mile section at the heart of the city [Mileti and Fitzpatrick, 1993]. Even more disastrous was the Kwanto earthquake in Japan that devastated the cities of Yokohama and Tokyo on September 1, 1923 [Hodgson, 1993].

In Yokohama, over 50 percent of the buildings were destroyed [Bolt, 1993], and as many as 208 fires broke out and spread through the city [Hodgson, 1964]. When the disaster was over, 33,000 people were dead [Bolt, 1993]. In Tokyo, the papers on electronic damage from the earthquake was less, but the resulting fires were more devastating. The fires lasted three days and restated in conclusion destroyed 40 percent of the city [Hodgson, 1964]. After the papers fire, 68,000 people were dead and 1 million people were homeless [Bolt, 1993]. The 1906 San Francisco earthquake and essay the Kwanto earthquake were two of the most famous and devastating earthquakes of this century. Research Papers! These earthquakes struck without warning and statements research with disastrous results. If earthquakes could be predicted, people would be able to evacuate from buildings, bridges, and overpasses, where most deaths occur. Some earthquakes have been successfully predicted. One of the research most famous predictions was the Haicheng Prediction in China. In 1970, Chinese scientists targeted the Liaoning Province as a site with potential for in conclusion a large earthquake.

These scientists felt that an earthquake would occur there in 1974 or 1975. On December 20, 1974, an on electronic voting earthquake warning was issued. Two days later, a magnitude 4.8 earthquake struck the Liaoning Province; however, further monitoring suggested a larger earthquake was imminent [Mileti and others, 1981]. On February 4, 1975, the Chinese issued a warning that an earthquake would strike Haicheng within 24 hours [Bolt, 1993]. Existence! The people in Haicheng were evacuated, and about 5.5 hours later, a magnitude 7.3 earthquake shook the research papers on electronic voting city of Haicheng.

If the people hadn't been evacuated, the vs organic essay death toll could have exceeded 100,000. Using geophysical precursors, the Chinese have predicted more than ten earthquakes with magnitudes greater than 5.0 [Meyer, 1977]. For example, the Chinese predicted a pair of earthquakes of magnitude 6.9 that occurred 97 minutes apart in Yunnan on May 19, 1976 [Bolt, 1993]. Despite these successes, the Chinese failed to predict the earthquake that struck the city of research on electronic Tangshan on restated thesis in conclusion, July 27, 1976; this earthquake killed 250,000 people and injured 500,000 more [Bolt, 1988]. This earthquake wasn't completely unexpected, but the Chinese believed it to be a few years away. Other earthquakes have been predicted, but the predictions didn't have enough precision for warnings to be issued.

For example, in research papers voting 1983, a young geophysicist predicted that an earthquake of magnitude 8 would strike Mexico City within four years [Deshpande, 1987]. Two years later, an statements research paper earthquake of magnitude 8 did strike Mexico City. Papers Voting! Because the prediction was not more precise, no warning was issued and thesis the earthquake took the population of Mexico City by surprise. Other predictions have turned out to be false warnings. Research Papers On Electronic Voting! For example, an earthquake warning was issued in August 1976 near Hong Kong [Bolt, 1988]. During the earthquake alert, people slept outdoors for two months. No earthquake occurred. I propose to review the available literature on thesis research paper, how geophysical precursors can be used for short-term predictions of earthquakes. In this review, I will achieve the following three goals: explain three commonly monitored geophysical precursors: ground uplift and tilt, increases in radon emissions, and changes in research papers the electrical resistivity of problems in materialism rocks; show what happens to each of these precursors during the five stages of an earthquake; and.

discuss how each of these precursors is used for short-term earthquake predictions. Geophysical precursors are changes in the physical state of the earth that are precursory to earthquakes. In addition to monitoring geophysical precursors, there are other strategies for predicting earthquakes-in particular, analyzing statistical data on prior earthquakes. Analyzing statistical data on prior earthquakes, however, is research voting solely a long-term prediction technique [Bolt, 1993]. For that reason, I will not consider it. In my review, I will discuss three common geophysical precursors: ground uplift and tilt, increases in radon emissions, and changes in the electrical resistivity of rocks. Making Thesis Statements! Earthquakes occur in on electronic five stages as there is a build up of elastic strain within faults in making thesis the earth, followed by the development of cracks in the rocks, then the influx of water into those cracks.

The fourth stage is the actual rupture of the fault and the release of seismic waves. The fifth stage is the sudden drop in stress in the fault. In this stage, aftershocks occur. During these five stages, the geophysical precursors follow distinct patterns. For instance, the ground uplift and tilt increases during the second stage as the voting volume of thesis statements paper rock increases. In my review, I will relate how the three geophysical precursors relate to the five stages of an papers voting earthquake and making thesis statements how well this relation can be used to research on electronic predict the oncoming fault rupture.

This section presents my plan for obtaining the objectives discussed in existence of god philosophy essay the previous section. Because of the recent earthquakes in California and Japan, there has arisen a strong interest to predict earthquakes precisely. Research Voting! As a consequence of that strong interest, many books and journals have been written on earthquakes and earthquake prediction. I have gathered five books and several articles on existence philosophy essay, the subject. In addition, there are dozens of books and articles available in the library. These books and articles should provide sufficient information for me to write my review. The following paragraphs discuss how I will use these sources in my research. The first goal of my research is to explain the physical principles behind monitoring geophysical precursors. For example, why does the electrical resistivity of rocks decrease before an oncoming earthquake? Or, what does a sudden increase in radon emissions reveal about the future likelihood of a massive earthquake?

The second goal of my research is to papers show what happens to each of these precursors during the five stages of an earthquake. To achieve these two goals, I will rely on three books that give an thesis statements research paper overview to earthquake prediction: Earthquakes [Bolt, 1988], Earthquakes and Geological Discovery [Bolt, 1993], and Earthquakes and papers on electronic voting Earth Structure [Hodgson, 1964]. A third primary goal of the literature review is to cover the accuracy of monitoring each precursor. By accuracy, I mean how well does the method work in predicting the problems in materialism essays time, place, and size of earthquakes. This discussion will not include many statistics on the predictions of earthquakes, because at present there just haven't been enough successful predictions to validate these types of statistics. Instead, I intend to on electronic evaluate the existence philosophy potential accuracy of monitoring each precursor based on papers on electronic voting, the opinions of experts and preliminary data. To achieve this goal, I will rely on two of existence of god my most recent sources: The Great Earthquake Experiment [Mileti and Fitzpatrick, 1993] and Earthquakes and Geological Discovery [Bolt, 1993]. Should I require additional sources other than the ones I have, I will search for them in the library system at the University of Wisconsin. Should I not be able to find that information, I will modify the papers scope of my research accordingly. Because the primary readers for my proposed literature review are engineering students who are probably not familiar with the theories behind earthquakes, I will have to provide selected background information frommy sources. These engineering students already know that earthquakes are devastating.

They also know that if earthquakes could be predicted, people would be able to prepare for them and lives would be saved. However, they may not know the vs organic farming essay different methods of research predicting earthquakes. My intent is to inform these students of conventional vs organic farming essay three methods of research voting predicting earthquakes. A secondary audience for the review would be non-technical readers who either live in earthquake-prone areas or are affected financially when earthquakes occur. Making Thesis Statements! My proposed literature review will provide this group with an unbiased discussion of three methods for earthquake prediction. This discussion, drawing much from overview chapters in Earthquakes, Animals and Man [Deshpande, 1987] and California Quake [Meyer, 1977], will put into papers voting, perspective how accurate, or inaccurate, the named methods are and what hurdles face engineers who try to predict earthquakes. This section presents my schedule, costs, and essay qualifications for performing the proposed research. The proposed research project culminates in a formal report that will be completed by on electronic December 6, 1995. To reach this goal, I will follow the schedule presented in Figure 1. Because I already possess several books and articles on earthquake prediction, most of my time will be spent sifting through the information, finding the key results, and presenting those results to the audience. Figure 1. Schedule for completion of literature review.

The two triangles represent milestones for the project, the first being the formal presentation on November 11, 1996, and making the second being the formal report on December 6, 1996. Given that I can obtain all my sources for the literature review from the research papers on electronic voting library, there is thesis in conclusion no appreciable cost associated with performing this literature review. The only costs, which will be minor, are for copying articles, printing the review, and spiral binding the review. I estimate that I can do these tasks for under $10. I am a senior in the Geological Engineering Department at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. Research Papers On Electronic Voting! In my undergraduate courses I have taken rock mechanics, soil mechanics, geophysics, and stratigraphy, all of which have included the philosophy principles of seismology and stress-strain relationships. In addition, I have taken field courses on structural geology that have introduced me to subsurface behaviors. I believe that these courses and on electronic my hands-on experience will aid me in assimilating the proposed literature review. For further information about my qualifications, see the attached resume (not attached on this web site) . Bolt, Bruce A., Earthquakes (New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1988). Bolt, Bruce A., Earthquakes and Geological Discovery (New York: Scientific American Library, 1993). Deshpande, Prof.

B. Making Thesis! G., Earthquakes, Animals and Man (Pune, India: The Maharashtra Association for papers on electronic the Cultivation of vs organic farming Science, 1987). Hodgson, John H., Earthquakes and Earth Structure (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1964). Meyer, Larry L., California Quake (Nashville: Sherbourne Press, 1977). Mileti, Dennis S., and Colleen Fitzpatrick, The Great Earthquake Experiment (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1993). All materials at this web site are the research papers voting intellectual property of the editors and authors.

You are more than welcome to make hypertext links as long as you give proper credit. If you have comments, suggestions, or questions, please direct them to one of the thesis statements for arumentative research editors.

Buy Essays Online from Successful Essay -
A Simplified Electronic Voting Machine System - SERSC Care analysis of a service user experiencing acute and papers voting, challenging mental health problems: Demonstrate a biopsychosocial understanding of a service users experience and an evidence based approach to your suggested intervention. Thesis Statements. The service user should have complex needs, which can offer challenges to services. An example of this might be: A service user who is admitted informally to an acute in patient unit where the research on electronic voting doors are locked. The service user may be presenting with depression, alcohol withdrawal and ideas of self-harm. Care analysis should identify: – Service users presenting problems, from the biopsychosocial perspective. – Risk assessment and management. – Recovery principles and engagement processes.

– Legal and in conclusion, ethical dimensions, such as deprivation of liberty. – Role and responsibilities of the mental health nurse. The client history and presentation should be put in as an papers appendix. – Identify and explore the thesis in conclusion biological, psychological, social and cultural factors that impact on mental health. – Enable the student to demonstrate expertise in eliciting a full biological, psychological and social history and to critically examine the links between causation, symptomology, treatment and management of challenging mental health presentations.

– Facilitate the voting exploration of the experience of acute and challenging presentations and references essay, critically analyse knowledge and research on electronic, experience to existence of god philosophy essay, make clinical judgments. Demonstrate competence in on electronic the use of care planning to promote service user independence and recovery. Knowledge and Understanding. – Understand the conventional essay biological explanations of mental health problems addressed with psychological and social perspectives of human responses and behaviour. – Evaluate data to research papers on electronic, identify and define acute / challenging presentations, analyse the use of specific nursing interventions and, informed by in materialism and culture best available evidence, utilise a collaborative approach when formulating and evaluating assessment and interventions used.

– Analyse the legislative frameworks, ethical dimensions and policy context in relation to complex mental health presentations. – Analyse and apply a variety of assessment tools and frameworks in research papers on electronic relation to references essay, challenging mental health needs and presentations. – Analyse and research papers on electronic, apply research to clinical practice. – Front page including your student number and for arumentative research, word count. – Double line spacing. – A margin of at least 2.54 cm on research, all sides of A4 paper. – Candidate number as header on all pages. – Page number as footer on existence essay, all pages. – A bio-psycho social perspective on personality development. – Understanding of diagnostic criteria for personality disorder.

– Engaging with the service user. – Assessing risk, including the research papers risk of essay self-harm, attempted suicide and papers voting, risk to others. – Legal and ethical frameworks for care. – Nursing intervention and the use of ‘self’ in engaging with this client group. – Development and documentation of care plans to achieve optimal health, habitation and rehabilitation, based on assessment and current nursing knowledge. – Understanding risk – the existence of god use of positive risk taking. – Collaborative approaches to risk management – clinical decision making. – Selection and application of appropriate assessment tools.

– Promoting the use of nurturing, psychologically and environmentally safe environments. – Prioritisation of need. – Empowering service users – maximising choice and decision making wherever possible. – Developing communication skills, written and verbal. – Legal and ethical frameworks for care. – Selection and on electronic, application of appropriate risk assessment tools and specific techniques in assessing substance misuse and existence, co existing mental health problems. – Assessment of research papers physical health needs in statements for arumentative research relation to substance use. – Collaborative approaches to care and care planning. – Understanding the papers on electronic voting impact of specific substances on the service users physical and mental well-being (during use and detoxification regimes) – Promoting service user understanding and ownership of care and treatment.

– Legal and ethical frameworks for care. Core Reading List. Barber, P. and Brown, R.E. (2012) Mental health law in England and Wales, 2nd ed. London: Sage Publishing. Bartlett, P. and Sandland, R. (2014) Mental health law: policy and philosophy, practice, 4th Edn. Oxford University Press. Bennett, P. Voting. (2011) Abnormal and clinical psychology: an introductory textbook, 3rd Edn. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Burke, T. (2010) ‘Psychiatric disorder: frequency and selected, mechanisms in understanding violence’ in Forensic mental health: concepts, systems and practice, Bartlett, A. McGauley, G. (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crome, I., Chambers, P., Frisher M., Bloor R. and Roberts, D (2009) Research Briefing: The relationship between dual diagnosis: substance misuse and dealing with mental health issues.

Available from riefing30.pdf (accessed 18/12/15). NICE (2010) NICE guideline – psychosis with coexisting substance misuse. The British Psychological Society and The Royal College of Psychiatrists. Avalibale from: guideline-181586413 (acc3essed 18/12/15). Hart, C. (2014) A pocket guide to risk assessment and management in mental health, Oxon: Routledge. National Institute for voting Mental Health in England (NIHME) (2009).

Personality disorder: No longer a diagnosis of statements for arumentative paper exclusion: London: NIHME. Steen, M. Thomas, M. On Electronic. (2015) Mental health across the existence lifespan. Oxon: Routledge. Alexander, R., Devapriam, J., Michael, D., McCarthy, J., Chester, V., Rai, R., Naseem, A. and Roy, A. (2015) “Why can’t they be in research papers voting the community?” A policy and practice analysis of restated transforming care for papers offenders with intellectual disability, Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 9 (3), pp. 139-148. American Psychiatric Association. (2013) The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) V. 4th ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association. Bouras, N., Hardy, S. and Holt, G. (2013). Mental health in intellectual disabilities. London: Pavilion Press.

Department of Health. Problems And Culture Selected. (2014) Achieving better access to mental health services by 2020. In: Department of research papers voting Health: London. Gates, B. and Mafuba, K. (2015) Learning disability nursing: Modern day practice. London: CRC Press, Taylor Francis. Cambridge, P. (2013) A rights approach to supporting the thesis sexual fetish of research papers on electronic voting a man with learning disability: Method, process and applied learning, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41 (4), pp. 259-265. Clark, A., Browne, S., Boardman, L., Hewitt, L. and Light, S. (2014) Implementing UK autism policy national institute for making health and care excellence guidance- assessing the papers on electronic voting impact of autism training for frontline staff in community learning disabilities teams, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, (early view). Fish, R., Woodward, S. and Duperouzel, H. (2012) ‘Change can only be a good thing:’ staff views on the introduction of a harm minimisation policy in a forensic learning disability service, British Journal of statements for arumentative research paper Learning Disabilities, 40 (1), pp. 37-45. Flynn, M. and Citarella, V. Research. (2013) Winterbourne view hospital: A glimpse of the legacy, The Journal of Adult Protection, 15 (4), pp.

173-181. Inchley-Mort, S., Rantell, K., Wahlich, C. and Hassiotis, A. (2014) Complex behaviour service: Enhanced model for selected challenging behaviour, Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 8 (4), pp. 219. James, I.A. Papers On Electronic Voting. (2011) Understanding behaviour in dementia that challenges: a guide to thesis, assessment and research, treatment, (Bradford Dementia Group Good Practice Guidelines), London: Jessica Kingsley Publishing. Jones, R. (2014) The story of baby P: Setting the record straight. University of Bristol: Policy Press. Loshak, R. (2013) Out of the references essay mainstream: helping the children of parents with a mental illness: New York, Routledge Press.

McCann, E. (2015) People who are transgender: Mental health concerns, Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22 (1), pp. 76-81. Whittington, R. Logan, C. (eds) (2011) Self harm and violence: towards best practice in managing risk in mental health services, Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell. – Challenging behaviour foundation – – The International Journal of Positive Behavioural Support – Interesting editorial: Use of medication for challenging behaviour in on electronic voting people with intellectual disability; Gyles Glover, Sarah Bernard, David Branford, Anthony Holland, Andre Strydom; The British Journal of making Psychiatry Jul 2014, 205 (1) 6-7; DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.141267 –

From NHS England: – Building the right support (also available in easy read), a national plan to develop community services and close inpatient facilities for research on electronic people with learning disabilities and/or autism who display behaviour that challenges, including those with a mental health condition. – The Service Model (also available in easy read) (and supplementary information) for commissioners, that describes what good services should look like. Alongside this, NHS England has also published: – Final Care and thesis statements for arumentative, Treatment Review (CTRs) guidance and tools (also available in easy read) to support commissioners in preventing unnecessary in-patient admissions and lengthy hospital stays.

Department of papers on electronic Health (2014) Care and Support Statutory Guidance. Available from attachment_data/file/366104/43380_23902777_Care_Act_B ook.pdf (accessed 18/12/15). Skills for Care Positive behaviour support ehaviour-challenges/Positive-behaviour-support.aspx (accessed 18/12/15). Skills for Care People whose behaviour challenges ehaviour-challenges/People-whose-behaviour-challenges .aspx (accessed 18/12/15).…/working-together-safeguard -children-guidance- 2013.aspx.

What are the psychosocial issues for references the person in the case study? This assessment provides you with the opportunity to examine the issues, available services and treatments for people living with a specific mental health illness. 1. On Electronic Voting. What are the psychosocial issues for the person in the case study? 2. What informal supports. are available to the person? 3. Existence Of God Philosophy Essay. What professional and/or agencies are involved or likely to be involved with the papers on electronic voting person? 4. What are the gaps in service delivery. for people with this mental health illness? 5. Conventional Farming. What advocacy needs to. happen for people with. this mental health issue?

Mark has been an excellent student throughout high school. He has been captain of the papers cricket team and very popular amongst his class mates and teachers. Last year things seemed to fall apart. His grades fell and he didn’t seem to references essay, be able to concentrate on study. His mother was concerned and took Mark to the local GP who couldn’t really see what was wrong. He gave Mark an antidepressant drug and said he would like to research, see Mark in a couple of months. The antidepressant didn’t seem to help much. Mark’s mother noticed a few other things. Mark seemed to have some odd thoughts – he said he could hear things and became upset when she told him she couldn’t hear them. Mark became more withdrawn and restated in conclusion, stopped going out with his friends.

He spent a lot of time in his room. His mother thought perhaps he was studying but he wouldn’t talk to research, her about what his school work was about. In Materialism Selected. Sometimes Mark is quite animated. He talks excitedly about science projects and says he has some unique ideas but that he can’t talk about them in case someone steals them. Mark has done well in science so his mother thinks he probably does have some good ideas but is puzzled as to papers on electronic, why he won’t talk about his ideas. His mother doesn’t know what to do or where to go for help. His exams are coming up and she is concerned that he doesn’t seem to be studying or focussing. The factors influencing the development of mental health services in your own area. Discuss the factors influencing the development of mental health services in your own area. You can focus on a geographical area or an conventional vs organic farming essay area of service delivery (such as youth mental health, or inpatient units, or psychiatric disability rehabilitation and research papers, support).

Consider the existence of god philosophy following in formulating your discussion: ? Particular historical, social and/or political characteristics that influenced mental health service delivery in your area of focus. ? National trends in mental health service delivery and how these can be seen in practice in your area of focus. ? How the factors influencing the development of mental health services have made a difference for people with mental illness in your area of focus, for their carers, for research on electronic voting mental health workers and for the general community. Ensure you refer to current Australian mental health policy and reports, reports from your area of focus and examples from your own practice and thesis, organisation. Using mobile apps will help to improve patient care. This essay is under health informatics subject it should talk about how health mobile apps will help patient to use EHR, talk to doctor by camera, know their medication and adjust their appointment.

Also, prove that mobile apps will help to improve patient care. Epidemiology in Master of Public Health. This assignment is for Epidemiology in masters of papers voting Public Health and nee to be done by a professional in Epidemiology. The assignment questions are attached along with two articles which need to be read very thoroughly to answer the existence of god assignment questions. Please note that the assignment should be plagiarism free and papers on electronic voting, i have required a plagiarism report. Making Statements. however it is ok the turnitin plagiarism report to research papers on electronic, be below 10-12%. if reference needed, please use vancouver system. Critical analysis of a selected scenario from Caseworld. Pain management, Type 2 diabetes mellitus ,Post Angioplasty Bleeding. and Pressure Area Care with miss Green.

so once my group finish them work i will upload them work to vs organic farming essay, do my conclusion. this is example from my friend. The purpose of this assignment is to explore the key priorities associated with the research papers voting case and obtain insights about what should be done in terms of applying evidence based nursing practice. Conventional Vs Organic Essay. This paper is based on papers on electronic voting, Elizabeth Green, a 79-year-old widow who has a history of hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease and osteoarthritis (School of Nursing Midwifery 2014). She was brought to the Emergency department via ambulance as she was complaining of severe unrelieved central chest pain radiating up her left shoulder, which lasted for more than 10 minutes (School of Nursing Midwifery 2014). Following a review by the Cardiac Team it was deemed essential that Mrs Green undergo angiography.

Therefore, she was admitted for the procedure and thesis, due to finding an occlusion, an angioplasty with stents was performed. As with any other medical procedure, angiography and angioplasty involve many potential risks. In the case of Mrs Green, a number of issues and risk factors post surgery were identified that. Based on Mrs Green’s scenario, this paper discusses various issues that are relevant to Mrs Green’s care post angioplasty such as. Scenario: You are the hospital administrator and are told by your ICU unit director of research papers on electronic a patient in the unit that has suffered serious brain damage, but is not currently meeting the criteria for complete brain death. Half of the family is insisting that the patient “wouldn’t want to live this way” and the other half is accusing them of wanting to kill the patient. Some allegations have been raised about a substantial inheritance for some family members upon the patient’s death.

The battle is becoming intense and problems in materialism and culture, it is beginning to disrupt the medical and nursing staff. 1) Write an research papers analysis of the situation from an ethical and legal perspective. Address the following questions: a) What are the making statements ethical issues? b) What are the legal issues? c) What are the medical care issues? d) What actions would you take? Why? How? e) What resources would you tap? 2) Prepare this assignment according to papers voting, the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

An abstract is not required. 3) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to of god philosophy, grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the on electronic voting assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. Medicaid and Medicare Administration. The Centers for conventional vs organic Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has specific administrative rules that need to be followed in order for research on electronic voting providers to problems, bill and receive reimbursement for services.

For this assignment, you will read three scenarios that demonstrate several key concepts of the Medicare and Medicaid programs and then answer questions pertaining to those scenarios. To complete this assignment, do the following: on the worksheet that is attached below.